Latvia: in April 2008 the European Commission expected growth of +2.5% for 2009. The outcome: −16.0%
Latvia: real GDP growth, %, 2009
Reality missed the forecast by 19 percentage points in a year. The forecast came close only in the last editions, with the year under way.
More
In spring and autumn the European Commission forecasts every EU country for this year and the next.
Across: when each forecast came out. Blue: the forecasts for 2009 in each edition; orange: the outcome. The shading is the error.
- European Commission, October 2007
+6.2%
European Commission forecasts (PDF 2000–2010, AMECO 2011–2026)
- European Commission, April 2008
+2.5%
European Commission forecasts (PDF 2000–2010, AMECO 2011–2026)
- European Commission, October 2008
−2.7%
European Commission forecasts (PDF 2000–2010, AMECO 2011–2026)
- European Commission, April 2009
−13.1%
European Commission forecasts (PDF 2000–2010, AMECO 2011–2026)
- European Commission, October 2009
−18.0%
European Commission forecasts (PDF 2000–2010, AMECO 2011–2026)
- Outcome: 2009
−16.0%
The largest misses of a next-year forecast (without the pandemic years 2020–2021); for borrowing, the forecast made one or two years before the fiscal year with the largest overshoot in pounds. Outcome: latest: AMECO spring 2026 (2026-05-21).
The card does not say the forecast was worse than others: in 2008–09 almost everyone missed the same way. It shows how far reality can move from an official expectation in a single year.
A question for this picture
Could this have been seen a year ahead, and what should one have done with the forecast?