Research spending targets outside the EU: of 8, 2 were met, by Korea and the UK
- Korea: 3.5% by 20123.69
- UK: 2.4% by 20272.68
- China: 2.5% by 20202.36
- China: 2.2% by 20152.02
- Japan: 4% by 20203.27
- Brazil: 1.5% by 20101.16
- Russia: 1.77% by 20151.1
- India: 2% by 20170.67
Research spending in the year due, % of GDP
Of 8, 2 were met, by Korea and the UK.
India aimed for 2% of GDP by 2017 and spent 0.67%; Russia aimed for 1.77% by 2015 and spent 1.1%. China fell a little short both times: 2.02% against 2.2% and 2.36% against 2.5%.
More
Governments often set a goal of spending a given share of GDP on research and development. Here are eight such goals of seven countries and what they spent in the year due, government and companies together.
A row is one promise: who, what and by when. The question is whether at least half came true. Answer Yes or No, or just open the answer: each row gets its outcome and what actually came of it, the card a stamp counting those that came true. Quotes and links to the facts are below.
- UK: 2.4% by 2027 — UK Government, 2017 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 2 by 2027; fact 3 (112%). The 2.4%-by-2027 target is already met: above 2.4% since 2018, 2.68% of GDP in 2023 (after the ONS method revision).
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Korea: 3.5% by 2012 — Ministry of Science and Technology of South Korea, 2007 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 4 by 2012; fact 4 (105%). 2012: 3.69% of GDP against 3.5%; 2011 was 3.44%; above 3.5% from 2012 on.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- China: 2.5% by 2020 — State Council of China, 2016 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 3 by 2020; fact 2 (94%). 2020: 2.36% of GDP against a target of 2.50%; 2023: 2.58%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- China: 2.2% by 2015 — National People’s Congress of China, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 2 by 2015; fact 2 (92%). 2015: 2.02% of GDP against a target of 2.20%; 2023: 2.58%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Japan: 4% by 2020 — Cabinet of Japan, 2016 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 4 by 2020; fact 3 (82%). 2020: 3.27% of GDP against a target of 4.00%; 2023: 3.44%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Brazil: 1.5% by 2010 — Ministry of Science and Technology of Brazil, 2007 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 2 by 2010; fact 1 (77%). 2010: 1.16% of GDP against a target of 1.50%; 2023: 1.19%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Russia: 1.77% by 2015 — Vladimir Putin, 2012 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 2 by 2015; fact 1 (62%). 2015: 1.10% of GDP against a target of 1.77%; 2024: 0.94%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- India: 2% by 2017 — Manmohan Singh, 2012 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 2 by 2017; fact 1 (33%). 2017: 0.67% of GDP against a target of 2.00%; 2020: 0.65%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
Targets: verbatim from government plans, decrees and strategies. Fact: World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics data), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS, linked on the back for each row. Outcome: «came true» — the promised number reached by the deadline («about» within 5%), an event happened before the end of the year promised; «exceeded» — with room to spare; «nearly» — short by no more than 10%; «late» — reached, but after the deadline; «did not come true» — not reached; «came true, then undone» — reached, then reversed. The deadline is the end of the year named.
The UK deadline, 2027, has not come: the bar is 2023, and the target is already passed (after the statistics office revised its method). Korea’s bolder goal of 5% by 2012 and Russia’s 2.5% by 2020 are separate cards.
A question for this picture
Why do research spending targets come true more often where spending is already high?