Europe 2020 research spending targets: of 9 countries, 2 met theirs, Belgium and Germany
- Belgium: target 3%3.37
- Germany: target 3%3.09
- Denmark: target 3%2.97
- Sweden: target 4%3.5
- Austria: target 3.76%3.21
- Finland: target 4%2.93
- France: target 3%2.27
- Slovenia: target 3%2.16
- Estonia: target 3%1.73
Research spending in 2020, % of GDP
Of 9 countries, 2 met theirs, Belgium and Germany.
Finland and Sweden aimed for 4% of GDP and spent 2.93% and 3.5%. Estonia, aiming for 3%, spent 1.73%; France, 2.27%.
More
Under the Europe 2020 strategy the EU wanted to spend 3% of GDP on research and development, and in 2011 each country named its own target. Here are nine countries with targets of 3% or more and what they spent in 2020, government and companies together.
A row is one promise: who, what and by when. The question is whether at least half came true. Answer Yes or No, or just open the answer: each row gets its outcome and what actually came of it, the card a stamp counting those that came true. Quotes and links to the facts are below.
- Belgium: target 3% — Government of Belgium, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 3 by 2020; fact 3 (112%). 2020: 3.37% of GDP against a target of 3.00%; 2023: 3.27%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Germany: target 3% — Government of Germany, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 3 by 2020; fact 3 (103%). 2020: 3.09% of GDP against a target of 3.00%; 2023: 3.15%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Denmark: target 3% — Government of Denmark, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 3 by 2020; fact 3 (99%). 2020: 2.96% of GDP against a target of 3.00%; 2023: 3.05%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Sweden: target 4% — Government of Sweden, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 4 by 2020; fact 4 (88%). 2020: 3.50% of GDP against a target of 4.00%; 2023: 3.60%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Austria: target 3.76% — Government of Austria, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 4 by 2020; fact 3 (85%). 2020: 3.21% of GDP against a target of 3.76%; 2023: 3.25%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- France: target 3% — Government of France, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 3 by 2020; fact 2 (76%). 2020: 2.27% of GDP against a target of 3.00%; 2023: 2.18%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Finland: target 4% — Government of Finland, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 4 by 2020; fact 3 (73%). 2020: 2.93% of GDP against a target of 4.00%; 2023: 3.09%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Slovenia: target 3% — Government of Slovenia, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 3 by 2020; fact 2 (72%). 2020: 2.16% of GDP against a target of 3.00%; 2023: 2.13%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
- Estonia: target 3% — Government of Estonia, 2011 % of GDP, R&D expenditure
promised 3 by 2020; fact 2 (58%). 2020: 1.73% of GDP against a target of 3.00%; 2023: 1.84%.
World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
Targets: the EU countries’ 2011 national reform programmes, as compiled by the European Commission. Fact: World Bank, World Development Indicators (UNESCO Institute for Statistics data), GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS, linked on the back for each row. Outcome: «came true» — the promised number reached by the deadline («about» within 5%), an event happened before the end of the year promised; «exceeded» — with room to spare; «nearly» — short by no more than 10%; «late» — reached, but after the deadline; «did not come true» — not reached; «came true, then undone» — reached, then reversed. The deadline is the end of the year named.
Denmark fell 0.04 percentage points short. Finland spent less in 2020 than in 2011, when it set the target: the share fell after the electronics slump. The EU as a whole spent about 2.3% of GDP in 2020.
A question for this picture
Why did the countries with the highest targets fall furthest short of them?