Macroscope
RU
Loading findings…

  1. Science and space

    AI: 7 million times more training compute in 12 years

    Parameters×11.2KTraining compute×7.02M×1×100×10K×1M×100M2012201420162018202020222024Log scale · 2012 = ×1

    AlexNet (2012) vs DeepSeek-V3 (2024): 11.2 thousand times the parameters, 7.02 million times the training compute. Different tasks; this compares scale, not quality.

    Source: Epoch AI · model authors’ publicationsOpen on the chart →
    More

    Training compute increased much more than parameter count for this pair. AlexNet classifies images; DeepSeek-V3 is a language model.

    One logarithmic scale of multiples of the 2012 value. Equal vertical distances mean equal ratios. Only the published points are shown; values between them were not measured. This compares scale, not performance.

    • AlexNet: parameters parameters

      60,000,000 · 2012-09-30

      Epoch AI

    • AlexNet: training compute FLOP

      4.700e+17 · 2012-09-30

      Epoch AI

    • DeepSeek-V3: parameters parameters

      671,000,000,000 · 2024-12-24

      Epoch AI

    • DeepSeek-V3: training compute FLOP

      3.300e+24 · 2024-12-24

      Epoch AI

    Four central Epoch AI estimates marked Confident. DeepSeek-V3 total parameters and training FLOP divided by AlexNet values; bounds are not substituted.

    Confident is the source’s confidence label, rather than an exact physical measurement. DeepSeek-V3 uses MoE: 671 billion total parameters, not all active per token. Parameters, compute and answer quality are not interchangeable. Two models do not describe all AI progress.

    A question for this picture

    How do compute, cost and quality change within one task and architecture?

More findings

All findings →